LinkBuildingServices

Editorial policy

How we research providers, set rankings, moderate reviews and fix mistakes.

Written by Asif RajaFact-checked by Mohammad QaiserUpdated

Research

Every provider is researched from its own pricing, service and terms pages, third-party profiles and published roundups. Marketplace profiles also use our price dataset. Facts are sourced on each review page, and each listing shows its evidence level. The full scoring method is on our methodology page.

Sources we rely on, in order

When two sources disagree, the one higher on this list decides what the page says, and the other is noted if it matters to a buyer.

Sales calls, private decks and promises made by email don't count on their own, because a reader has no way to check them. They tell us where to look; the page cites what we find there.

  1. The provider's own pages: pricing, terms, service descriptions, sample reports and case studies, read on the provider's site and dated when we read them.
  2. Independent profiles on Clutch, G2, Trustpilot, GoodFirms and similar platforms, for ratings, review counts, project sizes and what clients say went wrong as well as right. We read the reviews, not just the average.
  3. Named, dated roundups, cited by publisher and month, for figures a provider doesn't publish itself. A roundup's number is never presented as the provider's own.
  4. Our price study of 253,527 listing prices from 15 link marketplaces, which shows where a marketplace price sits against the rest of the market.

How we word prices

A price on this site always says where it came from, in the same sentence:

Rankings

Negative evidence

Credible complaints stay on the page even when the provider ranks near the top of a list. That covers patterns in client reviews, disputes a provider has answered in public, and contract terms that work against the buyer. Each one is attributed to where we found it and dated, so you can judge it yourself, and if a provider resolves the problem, the page says that too.

In practice a recommendation and a warning often sit on the same page. A provider can be the right pick for one kind of buyer and still have slow replacements or a refund dispute worth knowing about, and we would rather you read both before the first invoice than after it.

How often we re-check

Each provider's prices, minimums, terms, guarantees, ratings and case-study claims are checked again at least once every three months, and straight away when a provider or reader tells us something has changed. The latest full pass across the directory finished on October 15, 2026. Every review shows the date its own facts were last checked, next to the names of the people who checked them.

Names and dates on every page

Every review, list and guide carries two names: the researcher who gathered the facts and the editor who checked them, each linked to a profile with their background and the pages they've worked on. The date beside them is when the page's facts were last checked. A price change or a new guarantee moves that date; a design change doesn't.

How the site is funded

The site is free to read. We may earn revenue when readers hire some of the services we cover. That never changes a provider's score.

Community reviews

AI use

AI tools help with research and drafting. A named editor checks every fact against its source before publication.

An AI tool is never the source of a fact. Every price, rating and term on a page traces back to one of the sources listed above.

Corrections and right of reply

Send corrections to hello@linkbuildingservices.org or through the contact page. Providers can request a review, a correction or a reply through the provider page. Changes are dated on the page.

What a correction looks like

A useful correction names the page, quotes the sentence that's wrong and links to a source that shows the right fact, such as a current pricing page or updated terms. We check that source ourselves before changing anything.

If it holds up, we fix the page, update the date in its byline and change any other page that repeated the old fact. If it can't be verified from a source a buyer could also see, the page keeps the wording we can support.

A provider that disagrees with a verdict rather than a fact can send a reply. One that adds something a buyer should know, such as a changed process or the context behind a complaint, can be summarized on the page and credited to the provider.